RadioJiyar

  The End of the Era of Armed Kurdish Forces? From Peace with the PKK to the Dissolution of the SDF and the Withdrawal of Western Forces from Kurdistan: Is the Middle East Entering a New Phase? Analysis – Radio Jiyar Within a relatively short period, several major developments have been unfolding across the Middle East. Although they may initially appear unrelated, taken together they could signal a major shift in the political and security dynamics surrounding the Kurdish issue. In Turkey, the peace process with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) has entered a legal and implementation phase, with the Turkish parliament approving legislation in August 2026 aimed at advancing the disarmament and dissolution process. In Syria, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) have ended their independent military structure and begun the process of integrating their forces into the Syrian state’s institutions. At the same time, Germany has ended its military mission in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, ...

  From the Birth of the SDF to Its Dissolution: Have Syria’s Kurds Become Victims of Regional Power Politics? From Kobani to Damascus: More than a decade of war, thousands killed, and a dream of self-rule now facing a new political reality The announcement by Mazloum Abdi , commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) , on August 25, 2026, that the SDF’s independent military mission has come to an end is more than the dissolution of a military organization. It marks the end of an important chapter in the modern history of Syria’s Kurds. For more than a decade, the SDF evolved from a military coalition fighting ISIS into one of Syria’s most important political and military actors. It controlled large parts of northeastern Syria, fought ISIS with direct U.S. support, and established a form of self-administration in the areas under its control. Now, after years of war, thousands of deaths, and reliance on foreign powers, the SDF is being integrated into the Syrian state’s military ...

  Has Iran’s Military Strategy Strengthened the U.S. Security Role in the Middle East? In recent months, the direct confrontation between the Islamic Republic of Iran, Israel, and the United States has once again raised an important question across the Middle East: Has Tehran's military strategy, despite its declared objectives, ultimately strengthened the United States' security role in the region? It appears that whenever tensions between Iran, the United States, and Israel escalate, the Arab states of the Persian Gulf become increasingly reliant on Washington's security guarantees. Military exchanges—particularly those occurring near strategic energy routes, ports, maritime chokepoints, and critical infrastructure—have heightened concerns among Gulf governments about regional instability, creating greater momentum for expanding defense cooperation with the United States. At the same time, initiatives such as joint Arab security frameworks, the concept often referred t...

  The United States vs. the International Criminal Court: A New Battle Between National Sovereignty and Global Justice Introduction The announcement of a new U.S. campaign against the International Criminal Court (ICC) has once again brought a long-standing dispute between Washington and international justice institutions to the center of global attention. The U.S. government argues that the ICC represents a threat to American sovereignty because it claims the authority to investigate, prosecute, and potentially punish American officials and military personnel. Supporters of the ICC, however, argue that international courts are essential to ensuring accountability for serious crimes and preventing impunity, regardless of a person’s political position or nationality. This confrontation reflects a broader debate in international politics: should national sovereignty remain the highest principle, or should international institutions have the power to hold individuals accountable f...

  Power Transition in the Islamic Republic: The Marginalization of Hardliners or a Reconfiguration of the System? An Exclusive Analysis by Radio Jiyar Introduction Recent developments within the Islamic Republic of Iran have raised important questions about the emerging balance of power inside the country's political establishment. On one hand, renewed nuclear negotiations and efforts to reduce external tensions have once again become central issues. On the other hand, several influential figures associated with hardline factions appear to play a less prominent role in political discourse and strategic decision-making than in previous years. These developments have led some analysts to suggest that a gradual internal power transition may be underway—one that does not fundamentally alter the structure of the Islamic Republic but could shift influence toward more pragmatic actors who favor diplomacy and crisis management. Chapter One: Shifting Power Dynamics Within the Establishment ...

  Why Does the Islamic Republic Not End? The Anatomy of a Self-Healing Dictatorship By: Shoresh Mohi Introduction: The Illusion of Collapse Every time a major crisis hits the Islamic Republic of Iran — from the 2009 protests to the November 2019 unrest, from the 2022 uprising to recurring rumors of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s death — a familiar voice emerges saying: “This time it’s over.” Yet the system not only survives; it often emerges stronger and more ruthless. This recurring illusion — this painful hope that every shock leads to collapse — has itself become one of the regime’s most powerful tools. It keeps opponents waiting for a miracle while distracting them from understanding the real structure of power. The Islamic Republic is not merely a dictator, nor is it purely an ideology. It is a complex, multilayered, highly adaptable network of interests, fears, dependencies, and organized violence that, over four decades, has repeatedly redefined itself at the edge of c...

 Death in Dalahoo; Has the Islamic Republic Begun a New Phase of Silencing Kurdistan? At dawn on May 28, 2026, the village of Qal'eh-Kahwosh in Dalahoo became the scene of another bloody episode in the ongoing repression of Iranian Kurdistan. According to human rights sources, Meisam Weisi and Mojtaba Weisi, two Kurdish brothers, cultural activists, and followers of the Yarsan faith, were shot dead by Iranian security forces during a raid on a residential house. Reports indicate that armed forces surrounded the house and opened direct fire without warning. The two men were reportedly living in hiding following increasing pressure and threats after the nationwide protests and the intensified security crackdown in Kurdish regions. Meisam and Mojtaba Weisi were not military commanders or armed fighters. They were known among local communities as cultural activists involved in social and educational initiatives. Mojtaba Weisi was also recognized as an athlete and musician. Their names ...